Security-Monitoring using Microphone Arrays and Audio Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a security-monitoring instrument that can detect and classify the location and nature of different sounds in a room. The instrument is reliable and robust even in the presence of reverberation and in low signal to noise ratio conditions. This paper proposes a new algorithm for classifying first an audio segment as speech or nonspeech then classifies the nonspeech audio segment into its own audio type. The algorithm divides an audio segment into frames, estimates the presence of pitch in each frame, and calculates a pitch ratio parameter. This parameter is then used to classify the audio segment. The threshold used in calculating this parameter is adapted to accommodate different environments. Nonspeech audio segment has further classification using time delayed neural network to be classified into it is own type. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated for different signal-to-noise ratios using a library of audio segments. The library includes speech segments and nonspeech segments such as windows breaking and footsteps. Using 0.4 second segments it is shown that the proposed algorithm can achieve an average correct decision for 94.5% of the reverberant library and 95.1% of the nonreverberant library
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".