La polyphonie des registres culturels, une question de rapports à la culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les rapports qui différencient enseignement et culture selon la culture de référence. Un premier clivage existe entre les tenants de la transmission du patrimoine culturel et les défenseurs de la pédagogie centrée sur l’enfant ; un second, entre les promoteurs d’une conception éducative axée soit sur les compétences, soit sur la culture. Ces conceptions ne sont pas nécessairement dichotomiques, comme le montre la récente réforme de l’éducation au Québec. Toutefois, les concepteurs des programmes de formation n’ont pas répondu au voeu de rehaussement culturel formulé par le groupe de travail sur la réforme du curriculum. Aussi, la culture doit-elle reprendre la place qui lui était assignée, l’enseignant étant considéré comme un passeur culturel et comme le lieur du sensé au senti dans le cadre d’une éducation à la compréhension et à la relation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".