MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102868031 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2005.851259

Concurrent data transmission through analog speech channel using data hiding

2005· article· en· W2102868031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDecoding methodsData transmissionSpeech codingInformation hidingBit error rateTransmission (telecommunications)Speech recognitionEmbeddingVoice activity detectionChannel (broadcasting)Set (abstract data type)SIGNAL (programming language)Speech processingComputer hardwareComputer networkArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose to perform concurrent data transmissions through analog speech channels using a data hiding technique. In particular, concurrent data are modulated into a noise-like signal and imperceptibly embedded into voices. Conventional embedding methods usually treat speech as a source of interferences to the simultaneously transmitted data. The proposed scheme exploits the knowledge of the speech signal during embedding. Therefore, such an interference can be effectively removed, and a higher data rate can be achieved. Besides, the proposed scheme is compatible with conventional phone terminals. A conventional telephone set is still able to access the basic voice service, while the added decoding mechanism can extract the embedded data and provide various concurrent services. The performance of the proposed method is analyzed. Experimental results demonstrate that an acceptable data rate and bit-error rate can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it