EFEITOS DA INTERVENÇÃO EM GRUPO DE ATIVIDADES DE VIDA DIÁRIA PARA PESSOAS COM SEQUELAS DE ACIDENTE VASCULAR ENCEFÁLICO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: a stroke is described as neurological deficit occurring when there is an interruption of the blood supply and nutrients to a specific area of the brain resulting in brain injury. Limitations caused may interfere with the potential independence of individuals requiring rehabilitation with the goal to make the patient with hemiplegia as independent as possible in their daily routine. Objective: To investigate the effects of a group intervention for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) composed of six people after a stroke. Method: experimental design with pre-and post-test. The Barthel Index (BI) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM ) were used to measure the independence and satisfaction. Results: we observed an increase in independence, performance and satisfaction in performing ADL for all participants on BI and COPM. Conclusion: It was possible to identify the effectiveness of training ADL of patients with impairments after a chronic stroke. We suggest further studies covering different intervention goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".