Xenopus Ribosomal RNA Gene Intergenic Spacer Elements Conferring Transcriptional Enhancement and Nucleolar Dominance-like Competition in Oocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Repeated within the intergenic spacers that separate adjacent ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes in Xenopus laevis are several distinct sequence elements. These include transcription terminators, "region 0" repeats, "region 1" repeats, duplicated spacer promoters, and 42-bp enhancer elements that are embedded within 60 or 81-bp repeats. All have been reported to stimulate RNA polymerase I transcription from an adjacent gene promoter. A greater number of 42-bp enhancers/gene have been suggested to explain the preferential transcription of X. laevis rRNA genes in X. laevis x Xenopus borealis hybrids, an epigenetic phenomenon known as nucleolar dominance. However, the possible contribution of regions 0/1 and/or spacer promoters to the preferential transcription of X. laevis (over X. borealis) rRNA genes has never been tested directly. In this study, we systematically tested the various intergenic spacer elements for their contributions to promoter strength and nucleolar dominance-like competition in oocytes. In disagreement with a previous report, region 0 and region 1 repeats do not have significant enhancer activity, nor do they play a discernible role in X. laevis-X. borealis rRNA gene competition. Minigenes containing X. laevis spacer sequences are only dominant over minigenes having complete X. borealis spacers if a spacer promoter is located upstream of the 42-bp enhancers; X. laevis enhancers alone are not sufficient. These results provide additional evidence that spacer promoters together with adjacent enhancers form a functional activating unit in Xenopus oocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".