MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2102901471 · doi:10.1139/v05-076

Theoretical study of the reaction of titanium ion with ethane Structure, mechanism, and potential energy surface

2005· article· en· W2102901471 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dongju Zhang, Xuebing Fu, Ruoxi Wang, Chengbu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryPotential energy surfacePotential energyReaction mechanismComputational chemistryIonPhysical chemistryGas phaseThermodynamicsMoleculeAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Density functional theory in its B3LYP variant has been used to study the reaction of Ti+ (4F) with ethane in the gas phase. The potential energy surface corresponding to [Ti, C2, H6]+, has been examined in detail at the B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory. The quality of this theoretical method has been calibrated against the available thermochemical data. Three activation branches, C—H, C—C, and synchronous C—H and C—C bond activations, were proposed along the reaction coordinates, and two new mechanisms, the sequential 1,1-H2 elimination and the concerted elimination of CH4, were found.Key words: Ti+, ethane, reaction mechanism, potential energy surface, density functional theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies→French-language works237,207→