MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102913334 · doi:10.1109/icdcsw.2012.58

PDP: A Privacy-Preserving Data Provenance Scheme

2012· article· en· W2102913334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProvenanceComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)ServerComputer securityInformation privacyInternet privacyDatabaseComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data provenance, which records the history of the ownership of a document, as well as the actions performed on it, has received great attention in recent years. However, the privacy issue in data provenance has not been well investigated. In this paper, to simultaneously protect the security of data provenance and achieve user privacy preservation, we propose a new privacy-preserving data provenance (PDP) scheme. With the proposed PDP scheme, users can anonymously access the remoter servers and execute the secure provenance operations. Detailed security analysis demonstrates the security of the proposed PDP scheme, In addition, extensive efficiency analyses have also been conducted to examine its superior efficiency in terms of secure provenance storage and verification costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0060.011
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Data Security SolutionsFrench-language works237,207