MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102917763 · doi:10.1109/icit.2004.1490729

Design and implementation of a stable fuzzy model reference learning controller applied to a rigid-link manipulator

2005· article· en· W2102917763 on OpenAlexaff
Mary N. Sheppard, Mohammed Tarbouchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Computer scienceLink (geometry)Fuzzy logicControl engineeringFuzzy control systemTrajectoryController (irrigation)Stability (learning theory)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the design procedure that was followed to develop and implement a stable fuzzy model reference learning controller (FMRLC) for a rigid-link manipulator. A simulation-based phase plane approach is used to evaluate the stability of the controller. Simulation and experimental results are presented to demonstrate that the FMRLC exhibits learning abilities as well as the ability to adapt to varying system parameters. The results show that a well-designed FMRLC for a rigid-link manipulator can offer better performance than a classical direct fuzzy controller in applications where accurate reference model trajectory tracking and robustness to changes in system parameters are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207