MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102942331 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5332620

EEG seizure prediction: Measures and challenges

2009· article· en· W2102942331 on OpenAlexaff
Ardalan Aarabi, Reza Fazel-Rezai, Yahya Aghakhani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyBivariate analysisUnivariateComputer scienceEpileptic seizureArtificial intelligenceScalpEpilepsyPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningSpeech recognitionMultivariate statisticsPsychologyMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Different types of analyses of scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings using linear and nonlinear time series analysis method have been done. They showed strong evidence of detectable changes in the EEG dynamics from minutes up to several hours in advance of seizure onset. The predictive performance of univariate and bivariate measures, comprising both linear and non-linear approaches have been carried in different studies Direct comparison among different measures and methods in seizure prediction is not possible, unless they are applied to the same dataset. In this review paper, we describe different seizure prediction measures briefly and discuss the existing challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207