MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102942331 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5332620

EEG seizure prediction: Measures and challenges

2009· article· en· W2102942331 on OpenAlex
Ardalan Aarabi, Reza Fazel-Rezai, Yahya Aghakhani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyBivariate analysisUnivariateComputer scienceEpileptic seizureArtificial intelligenceScalpEpilepsyPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningSpeech recognitionMultivariate statisticsPsychologyMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Different types of analyses of scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings using linear and nonlinear time series analysis method have been done. They showed strong evidence of detectable changes in the EEG dynamics from minutes up to several hours in advance of seizure onset. The predictive performance of univariate and bivariate measures, comprising both linear and non-linear approaches have been carried in different studies Direct comparison among different measures and methods in seizure prediction is not possible, unless they are applied to the same dataset. In this review paper, we describe different seizure prediction measures briefly and discuss the existing challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207