MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103000363 · doi:10.3233/jcm-2004-4308

Reliable results for the Isotropic Dipole – Dipole and Triple – Dipole Dispersion Energy Coefficients for Interactions involving Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Acetone, and Mono - , Di - , and Tri - Methylamine

2004· article· en· W2103000363 on OpenAlexaff
Ashok Kumar, William J. Meath

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipoleFormaldehydeMethylamineAcetoneAcetaldehydeIsotropyDispersion (optics)Molecular physicsMaterials scienceChemistryAtomic physicsPhysicsOrganic chemistryOpticsEthanol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudo – spectral dipole oscillator strengths and excitation energies, which are discrete representations of previously developed recommended continuous dipole oscillator strength distributions(DOSDs), are presented for the ground state formaldehyde,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational Methods in Sciences and EngineeringSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207