Characterization of the human<i>SLC2A11</i>(GLUT11) gene: alternative promoter usage, function, expression, and subcellular distribution of three isoforms, and lack of mouse orthologue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GLUT11 (SLC2A11) is a class II sugar transport facilitator which exhibits highest similarity with the fructose transporter GLUT5 (about 42%). Here we demonstrate that separate exons 1 (exon 1A, exon 1B, and exon 1C) of the SLC2A11 gene generate mRNAs of three GLUT11 variants (GLUT11-A, GLUT11-B, and GLUT11-C) that differ in the amino acid sequence of their N-termini. All three 5'-flanking regions of exon 1A, exon 1B and exon 1C exhibited promoter activity when expressed as luciferase fusion constructs in COS-7 cells. 5'-RACE-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR, and Northern blot analysis performed with specific probes for exon 1A, 1B and 1C demonstrated that GLUT11-A is expressed in heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney, GLUT11-B in kidney, adipose tissue, and placenta, and GLUT11-C in adipose tissue, heart, skeletal muscle, and pancreas. Surprisingly, mice and rats lack the SLC2A11 gene. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, all three GLUT11 isoforms transport glucose and fructose but not galactose. There was no apparent difference in the subcellular distribution of the three isoforms expressed in COS-7 cells. Our data indicate that different promoters and splicing of the human SLC2A11 gene generate three GLUT11 isoforms which are expressed in a tissue specific manner but do not appear to differ in their functional characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".