Cirques of the Presidential Range, New Hampshire, and surrounding alpine areas in the northeastern United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evidence for rejuvenation of cirque glaciers following wastage of continental ice remains elusive for the Presidential Range and Mount Moosilauke of New Hampshire, Mount Katahdin and the Longfellow Mountains of Maine, and the Adirondack Mountains of New York. At Ritterbush Pond in the northern Green Mountains of Vermont, radiocarbon ages from lake sediment cores suggest that a low-altitude valley head, located up- valley of a series of cross-valley moraines, was ice-free by 11,940 14 C yrs BP (Bierman et al. , 1997). Although some workers argue that these moraines in Vermont are evidence for cirque glaciation, the moraines could have been formed by a tongue of continental ice during deglaciation. At Johnson Hollow Brook valley in the Catskill Mountains of New York, a radiocarbon age from basal sediments in a pond dammed by a moraine suggests that glacier ice may have persisted until 10,860 14 C yrs BP (Lederer and Rodbell, 1998). Because this moraine appears to have been deposited by a cirque glacier, the radiocarbon age provides the best evidence in the northeastern United States for cirque glaciation post-dating recession of continental ice. Cirque morphometric data, compiled from newly available topographic maps, add to the conundrum that these two sites in the Green and Catskill Mountains should not be nearly as favorable for maintaining local glaciers post- dating icesheet recession as higher-altitude and better-developed cirques in the Presidential Range and Mount Katahdin, where evidence for post-icesheet cirque glaciers is lacking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".