Hardware-software co-synthesis of partially re-configurable embedded systems optimized for reduced power consumption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a scheduling algorithm as part of the hardware-software co-synthesis of low power distributed embedded devices. We used a location priority based algorithm in order to address embedded computer systems consisting of processors, partially reprogrammable FPGAs, and other resources. Our proposed locality emphasized two-dimensional scheduling algorithm prioritizes the unused FPGA locations and chooses a task to match the given position. This is an unusual approach to task scheduling, where the norm is to prioritize the candidate pool of tasks and then decide on a location. The FPGA reconfiguration process consumes large amounts of power. This algorithm is optimized to reduce overall system power consumption and to ensure all tasks meet their respective deadlines. Preliminary experimental results reveal significant reconfiguration overhead reduction while maintaining a low deadline violation rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it