MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103090039 · doi:10.1109/iros.1998.724695

Combined PD feedback and distributed piezoelectric-polymer vibration control of a single-link flexible manipulator

2002· article· en· W2103090039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorVibrationVibration controlSIGNAL (programming language)Angular velocityLyapunov stabilityComputer scienceBeam (structure)EngineeringPhysicsAcousticsControl (management)Structural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new approach to control a single-link flexible manipulator by using smart actuators. A combined PD feedback for rigid motion control and the distributed piezoelectric polymer (PVDF) actuator for vibration damping is investigated using a Lyapunov approach. The PVDF actuator is designed independently from joint velocity of the manipulator, which allows high speed motions. Most of the current PVDF actuators are A-type schemes depending on measurement of the tip angular velocity of the beam, a signal not readily available. This paper is the first to show that the available linear velocity (at the tip) feedback control, L-type scheme, can also guarantee the stability of the system. The L-type scheme does not lead to control problems caused by mode truncation, and is more efficient to suppress the dominant mode vibration of the beam. Simulation results confirm these theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207