MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103134394 · doi:10.1109/twc.2006.1611062

On the downlink interference in heterogeneous wireless DS-CDMA networks

2006· article· en· W2103134394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of TorontoBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunications linkInterference (communication)Wireless networkRadio resource managementCellular networkCode division multiple accessWirelessComputer networkHeterogeneous networkChannel (broadcasting)Spread spectrumTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that the total downlink interference in heterogeneous wireless DS-CDMA networks follows an asymptotically self-similar (as-s) process. The as-s model is valid for the interference under certain conditions on channel variations and traffic characteristics that cover a range of practical situations. We derive these conditions and generalize earlier results, obtained for data-centric cellular networks, to heterogeneous cellular networks. Simulation results for actual cases confirm analytical results, and show that non-uniform spatial distribution of users and their soft-hand-off status do not affect the nature of this self-similar process. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of the analysis developed in this paper in designing appropriate mechanisms for controlling radio resources in such networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0100.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it