MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103140801 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n1p157

Analysis of the Risk-Factors of Cardio-Vascular Disease in Russia and Its Regions

2014· article· en· W2103140801 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
F F Ishkineeva, Simbul Akhmetova, RAUSHANIA F . GAIFULLINA, Farid Ishkineev

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsDiseaseEnvironmental healthMedicineDemographyBusinessGeographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the long time in the structure of the mortality reasons the dominant role belongs to the circulatory diseases, which are determine more than half of the deaths. At the same time, the situation differs in different countries and there are evidences that in most of the developed countries the rate of the deaths caused by cardio-vascular diseases is significantly lower than in Russia. It’s necessary to organize further researches dedicated to the determination of the risk factors in Russia and its regions to determine the causes of deaths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207