Waiting for the Surveyor: Development Promises and the Temporality of Infrastructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen Tras décadas de reforma agraria en la región oriental del Paraguay, la promesa y la esperanza de una redistribución de las tierras estatales sigue presente en la apreciación que tienen los campesinos de los agrimensores del estado. Esta valorización sigue a pesar de decepciones constantes, de corrupción abierta y paternalismo abusivo. El artículo sostiene que la promesa que da el agrimensor se basa en la lógica infraestructural del desarrollo: la premisa que las pequeñas inversiones en el terreno pueden conducir, con el tiempo, a importantes cambios sociales y económicos. Mirando esta historia en relación a las últimas décadas de las teorías del desarrollo en América Latina, el artículo también sugiere un replanteamiento del concepto de infraestructura para la antropología en general. El concepto suele evocar la dimensión espacial del ambiente humano, a costas de la dimensión temporal que le da tanto poder político.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".