New combined polymer/chromium approach for investigating the phototransformations involved in hologram formation in dichromated poly(vinyl alcohol)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The photochemical behavior of dichromated poly(vinyl alcohol) films has been analyzed upon exposure at 365 nm in relationship with the performances of holograms recorded in such photosensitive materials. The evolution of both involved species, poly(vinyl alcohol) and chromium, has been quantified by the implementation of an innovative approach. This approach combines the monitoring of the structural modification of the polymeric matrix and the fate of the various chromium species. For the first time, it has been established that chromium(V) not only is an indicator of the hologram quality, as previously assessed, but also appears to be responsible for the crosslinking implied in the hologram formation. Actually, the crosslinking has been proved to proceed through coordination bonds around chromium(V), which acts as a bridge between the polymeric chains. The role played by the ammonium cations in the hologram quality has also been elucidated. The improvement brought by ammonium dichromate with respect to potassium dichromate involves amide groups resulting from poly(vinyl alcohol) phototransformation. These groups provide additional chelating sites for chromium(V), leading to an increase in the matrix crosslinking. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 1317–1325, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".