MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103171768 · doi:10.5539/cis.v7n3p58

Design and Analysis of Bayesian Model Predictive Controller

2014· article· en· W2103171768 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yijian Liu, Weixing Qian, Liming Di

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceShanghai Municipal Education CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceModel predictive controlBayesian probabilityRobustness (evolution)Nonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)TracingController (irrigation)Convergence (economics)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel predictive controller based on a Bayesian inferring nonlinear model (BMPC) is presented and analyzed. In the construction of the BMPC, the Bayesian inferring model is selected as the predictive model with the characteristics of on-line tracing ability to the actual controlled object. The nonlinear programming method called the steepest gradient is set as the receding horizon optimization algorithm of the BMPC. The on-line controller output is obtained using this method. The convergence analysis of the proposed BMPC is given and the examples (nonminimum phase and nonlinear objects) are selected to validate the performance of the BMPC. The simulation results show that with the help of the presented BMPC algorithm, the closed loop control system demonstrates the abilities of anti-disturbance and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207