MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103208492

The Role of Leadership within an Action Research Study of Secondary Science Assessment Praxes, 5(8)

2001· article· en· W2103208492 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas G. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEJLL: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisAction researchAction (physics)PedagogyEngineering ethicsPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arguably, leadership is an integral element of all human endeavours. Using leadership as a lens this paper addresses the role of leadership within an action research study of secondary science teachers’ assessment praxes. The traditional image of the leader is abandoned in favour of a facilitative, collaborative leader who supports participants in their journey towards new understandings of assessment theory and praxis. In sum, it is realized that the careful, informed leader of action research plays a significant and central role in the professional development of fellow educators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.427
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEJLL: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in LearningSame topicInnovative Education and Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207