MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103216867 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh009

Relationships among various nucleoside resistance-conferring mutations in the reverse transcriptase of HIV-1

2003· review· en· W2103216867 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverse transcriptaseResistance mutationLamivudineNucleoside Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorVirologyDrug resistanceBiologyZidovudineMutationLentivirusReverse-transcriptase inhibitorHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirusViral diseaseAntiretroviral therapySidaGeneticsViral loadRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved HIV-related morbidity and mortality, and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors remain an essential component of treatment. However, the emergence of HIV-1 mutated strains that are resistant to one or more antiretroviral drugs is a leading cause of treatment failure among patients living with HIV/AIDS. These resistant strains may often suffer from a replication disadvantage in comparison with wild-type viruses when grown in the absence of drug pressure and a potential benefit in this regard has been shown for lamivudine-resistant viruses that contain a M184V mutation in reverse transcriptase, as well as for several other drug-resistant viral variants. Interactions between different mutations may complicate the understanding of HIV drug resistance with regard to the likelihood of therapeutic success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207