MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103225616 · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.877522

Fusion of Hidden Markov Random Field Models and Its Bayesian Estimation

2006· article· en· W2103225616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov random fieldBayesian probabilityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMarkov processHidden Markov modelRandom fieldMarkov modelPattern recognition (psychology)Field (mathematics)EstimationMarkov chainMathematicsMachine learningStatisticsImage segmentationImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a Hidden Markov Random Field (HMRF) data-fusion model. The proposed model is applied to the segmentation of natural images based on the fusion of colors and textons into Julesz ensembles. The corresponding Exploration/ Selection/Estimation (ESE) procedure for the estimation of the parameters is presented. This method achieves the estimation of the parameters of the Gaussian kernels, the mixture proportions, the region labels, the number of regions, and the Markov hyper-parameter. Meanwhile, we present a new proof of the asymptotic convergence of the ESE procedure, based on original finite time bounds for the rate of convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it