Prioritization of candidate disease genes for metabolic syndrome by computational analysis of its defining phenotypes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a rapid increase in the world-wide burden of disease attributed to metabolic syndrome, as defined by co-occurrence of an array of phenotypes including abdominal obesity, dysglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hypertension. Familial studies clearly indicate a genetic component to the disease and many linkage studies have identified a large number of linked loci. No disease-causing genes, however, have been conclusively identified, most likely because this is a multigenic disease for which effects of many causative genes may be small and combined with environmental effects. To assist empirical identification of metabolic syndrome associated genes, we present here a novel computational approach to prioritize candidate genes. We have used linkage studies and the clinical and population-specific presentation of the disease to select a final candidate gene list of 19 most likely disease-causing genes. These are predominantly involved in chylomicron processing, transmembrane receptor activity, and signal transduction pathways. We propose here that information about the clinical presentation of a complex trait can be used to effectively inform computational prioritization of disease-causing genes for that trait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it