MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103236378 · doi:10.1109/isie.2006.295835

Design Considerations of a Straight Bladed Darrieus Rotor for River Current Turbines

2006· article· en· W2103236378 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsScope (computer science)Rotor (electric)Current (fluid)Marine engineeringWork (physics)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceDesign toolEmphasis (telecommunications)EngineeringSystems engineeringMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrokinetic turbines convert kinetic energy of moving river or tide water into electrical energy. In this work, design considerations of river current turbines are discussed with emphasis on straight bladed Darrieus rotors. Fluid dynamic analysis is carried out to predict the performance of the rotor. Discussions on a broad range of physical and operational conditions that may impact the design scenario are also presented. In addition, a systematic design procedure along with supporting information that would aid various decision making steps are outlined and illustrated by a design example. Finally, the scope for further work is highlighted

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207