MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103272296 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2000.905502

Generic modeling of 3D objects from single 2D images

2002· article· en· W2103272296 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume-Alexandre Bilodeau, Robert Bergevin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriComputer visionArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Set (abstract data type)Context (archaeology)Basis (linear algebra)Solid modeling3D modeling3d modelContext modelComputer graphics (images)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addresses the problem of building generic 3D models of structured objects on the basis of single 2D intensity images. In the context of the paper, generic modeling refers to the situation where analysis of the image information is performed on the sole basis of generic knowledge. That is, no a priori knowledge about the specific quantitative shape properties of the objects of interest is ever assumed. Moreover, images of interest are realistic. For instance, they may contain complex foreground 3D objects with textures and shadows, and a cluttered background. Objects are modeled by their constituent parts and connections. Therefore, a partly occluded object could be recognized from its model. Part models are based on geons, which are a set of qualitative generalized cylinders. An overview of the architecture of the modeling system is presented, along with the functionality of each subsystem and processing results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207