Segmented Hemispherical DRA: New Geometry Characterized and Investigated in Multi-Element Composite Forms for Wideband Antenna Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemispherical dielectric resonator antenna (HDRA) is reinvestigated by splitting it into four uniform quarters, which indeed generates a new DRA shape, proposed to call as “quarter-Hemispherical DRA” (q-HDRA). An innovative idea, gathered by the authors through their previous investigations, has been employed to investigate four-element q-HDRA resonating with dominant and first higher modes over a large impedance bandwidth (S11<; -10dB) and producing improved monopole-like radiation pattern. The improvement has been described in terms of uniformity and symmetry in the radiation patterns obtained consistently over the entire operating bandwidth. No degradation or compromise in impedance bandwidth is observed. For this purpose, the new DRA unit (q-HDRA) has been characterized using simulated and measured data. Prototypes of single and multi-element q-HDRA have been measured and compared with some earlier versions. Unlike earlier one, consistently symmetric monopole-like radiation from a four element q-HDRA has been demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".