MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103277915 · doi:10.1117/1.3319819

Optical evanescent field waveguide Bragg grating pressure sensor

2010· article· en· W2103277915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingMaterials scienceWaveguideOpticsPressure sensorRefractive indexGratingDistributed Bragg reflectorPolarization (electrochemistry)OptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ridge waveguide Bragg grating pressure or touch sensor is proposed. The sensor consists of an open-top ridge waveguide Bragg grating with an overlaid pressure sensing polydimethylsiloxane film. The effective index of the guided mode of the waveguide is changed by stress-induced variations in the film refractive index that are caused by increases in pressure normal to the waveguide. Pressure is then measured by monitoring the shift of the Bragg resonance resulting from the changes to the effective index. By using the smaller core size ridge waveguide, and a polymer with smaller Young's modulus, the sensitivity of the sensor is enhanced. By utilizing the polarization dependence of the sensor response, a temperature-independent pressure sensor can be realized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it