MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103293198 · doi:10.1139/t04-097

Microstructural model for delayed deformation of clay: loading history effects

2005· article· en· W2103293198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eduardo Alonso Pérez de Ágreda, Vicente Navarro

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOedometer testGeotechnical engineeringConsolidation (business)MacroporePorosityDeformation (meteorology)CreepMaterials scienceCompression (physics)SwellingContext (archaeology)Expansive clayClay soilGeologyComposite materialSoil waterSoil scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microstructural observations of clayey soils indicate that clay particles are aggregated in units of low internal porosity (microporosity). Larger voids (macroporosity) between those units are associated with the flow of free water. Within this context, the secondary deformation of clay is interpreted as being a consequence of local mass transfer of water from the micropores to the macropores. The capability of a model based on this idea to reproduce the effects of loading history on the secondary compression of clay is explored. An experimental test program has been performed, secondary compression records have been interpreted within the proposed theoretical framework, and material parameters have been derived. The simulation of additional validation tests has been successful. The theory and model developed provide a unified framework for compression, as well as swelling secondary deformation.Key words: secondary consolidation, creep, preloading, overconsolidation ratio, oedometer tests, swelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207