MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103304233 · doi:10.1142/s0219649210002498

Comparison of Matrix Dimensionality Reduction Methods in Uncovering Latent Structures in the Data

2010· article· en· W2103304233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information & Knowledge Management · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular value decompositionDimensionality reductionComputer scienceCurse of dimensionalityMatrix (chemical analysis)DecompositionReduction (mathematics)Matrix decompositionData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matrix decomposition methods: Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and Semi Discrete Decomposition (SDD) are proved to be successful in dimensionality reduction. However, to the best of our knowledge, no empirical results are presented and no comparison between these methods is done to uncover latent structures in the data. In this paper, we present how these methods can be used to identify and visualise latent structures in the time series data. Results on a high dimensional dataset demonstrate that SVD is more successful in uncovering the latent structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it