Effect of chronic AT1 receptor blockade on cardiac Smad overexpression in hereditary cardiomyopathic hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As the pharmacological suppression of angiotensin has been associated with cardioprotective effects in cardiomyopathy, our primary aim was to determine whether the expression of Smad protein components of the cardiac TGF-beta signaling cascade is modulated by chronic AT(1) receptor blockade. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between cardiac Smad protein expression and altered collagen turnover in the cardiomyopathic heart. METHODS: Male UM-X7. 1 cardiomyopathic (CMP) Syrian hamsters at early (65 days) and late (200 days) stages of cardiomyopathy were subjected to 4 week losartan (15 mg/kg/day) treatment. Expression of left ventricular (LV) receptor-activated (Smad 2) and common-mediator (Smad 4) Smads from control (F1-beta strain) hamsters, non-treated cardiomyopathic (CMP), and losartan-treated CMP animals was assessed. Collagen turnover, including fibrillar collagen synthesis/accretion and cardiac MMP activity was assessed. RESULTS: Elevated mRNA abundance of fibrillar collagens and ANF were present in cardiomyopathic hearts and these trends were normalized in the early stage losartan-treated group. 4-Hydroxyproline and zymographic assays confirmed fibrosis and elevated MMP-1 and -2 activities in CMP hearts. Losartan treatment was associated with a modest reduction of cardiac 4-hydroxyproline concentration, and a significant reduction of both MMP-1 and MMP-2 activities. While TGF-beta(1) mRNAs were elevated in both CMP groups vs. controls, total TGF-beta protein content was not different in CMP vs. controls. In LV preparations containing nuclear extract, elevated Smad 2 and Smad 4 protein expression was noted in cardiomyopathic hearts vs. controls. Losartan treatment of late-stage CMP hamsters was associated with a significant reduction in Smad 2 and a modest reduction of Smad 4 protein expression vs. untreated CMP samples. CONCLUSIONS: Altered cardiac Smad expression, present in both early and late stage cardiomyopathy, is positively correlated with the occurrence of cardiac fibrosis and elevated collagen turnover in failing CMP hearts. Four week AT(1) blockade is associated with normalized expression of cardiac Smad 2 proteins, and these changes occur in parallel with some aspects of collagen turnover in failing cardiomyopathic hearts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".