Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Tamoxifen and/or Goserelin in Premenopausal Breast Cancer-<i>Self-rated Physiological Effects and Symptoms</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After primary surgery, 149 premenopausal breast cancer patients, with node-negative disease, were randomized to one of four treatment groups: goserelin, tamoxifen, goserelin plus tamoxifen or to a systematically untreated control group. The aim was to assess the effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in terms of physical symptoms and perception of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Assessments were made before randomization, at 3-4 months and at 12 months. Treatment with goserelin resulted in early and more intense menopausal symptoms, while the effects of tamoxifen were slower and milder. The side effects with goserelin appeared to be alleviated by concurrent tamoxifen except for vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes, sweating, feeling warm). No significant group differences were found for anxiety and depressive symptoms. In conclusion, chemical castration with goserelin was associated with the highest level of physical symptoms. The group treated with tamoxifen alone showed the lowest levels of symptoms among the treatment groups, except for vaginal discharge and irregular bleedings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".