PENGARUH PARIWISATA TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the impact of tourism to economic growth in Indonesia during 1995 – 2000. \nBased on quarterly time series data and using VAR model, the study tries to analyze patterns of causal \nrelationship between the growth of tourism (tourism receipts) and economic growth. The results showed \nseveral conclusions : (i) the growth of tourism and economic growth have reciprocal causal relationship. \nHowever, the impact of tourism (receipts) growth increase will accelerate the economic growth with \ntime lag 5 – 6 quarters, while the increase of GDP growth will boost the increase of tourism growth on \nthe next quarter. This study also found that the tourism promotion policy would affected the tourism \ngrowth on the next 1 – 3 following quarters. In Indonesia, bomb terrors will adversely impact on the \ngrowth of tourism of the first two following quarters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it