MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103345270 · doi:10.1364/ao.49.001414

Diffuse light propagation in biological media by a time-domain parabolic simplified spherical harmonics approximation with ray-divergence effects

2010· article· en· W2103345270 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Bouza Domínguez, Yves Bérubé-Lauzière

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoton transport in biological tissueMonte Carlo methodDiffusion equationPhysicsPhoton diffusionSpherical harmonicsRadiative transferDiffusionParabolic partial differential equationPartial differential equationVector spherical harmonicsDivergence (linguistics)Mathematical analysisOpticsHarmonicsComputational physicsMathematicsDynamic Monte Carlo methodQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simplified spherical harmonics approximation for the time-domain radiative transfer equation including the source-divergence effect. This leads to a set of coupled partial differential equations (PDEs) of the parabolic type that model diffuse light propagation in biological-tissue-like media. We introduce a finite element approach for solving these PDEs, thereby obtaining the time-dependent spatial profile of the fluence. We compare the results with the diffusion equation and Monte Carlo simulations. The fluence obtained via our model is shown to reproduce well the Monte Carlo results in all cases and improves on the solution of the diffusion equation in homogeneous diffusive-defying media. Our solution also shows more sensitivity than the diffusion equation to changes in the absorption coefficient of small inclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207