Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pese a las muchas investigaciones emprendidas por diversos especialistas de las ciencias humanas sobre u no u otro aspecto del proceso de la representación simbólica colectiva, seguimos lejos de una teoría global que considere todos los aspectos de este proceso y que los incorpore en el conjunto de los comportamientos sociales. Estamos aún en las teorías intermedias, como la de Tumer para el ritual, la de Lévi-Strauss para la mitología, la de Middleton para la brujería, etc. Además, como bien lo dice Godelier, aún está por elaborarse la teoría marxista de la religión. De modo que los antecesores de cada uno de ellos, Frazer, Tylor, Durkheim, etc., se hallan todavía en el meollo de las grandes explicaciones.* Représentations colletives et societés, en "La rupture entre l'entreprise et les hommes", A. Chanlat y M. Dofour, 1985, Quebéc - Ameriqué, París-Montreal, pp. 195-242.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".