User-calibration-free remote eye-gaze tracking system with extended tracking range
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel general method to extend the tracking range of user-calibration-free remote eye-gaze tracking (REGT) systems that are based on the analysis of stereo-images from multiple cameras is presented. The method consists of two distinct phases. In the brief initial phase, estimates of the center of the pupil and corneal reflections in pairs of stereo images are used to estimate automatically a set of subject-specific eye parameters. In the second phase, these subject-specific eye parameters are used with estimates of the center of the pupil and corneal reflections in images from any one of the systems' cameras to compute the Point-of-Gaze (PoG). Experiments with a system that includes two cameras show that the tracking range for horizontal gaze directions can be extended from ±23.2° when the two cameras are used as a stereo pair to ±35.5° when the two cameras are used independently to estimate the POG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it