MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103412737 · doi:10.1039/b914570b

Ab initio study of oxygenreduction mechanism at Pt4cluster

2009· article· en· W2103412737 on OpenAlexafffund
Ata Roudgar, Michael Eikerling, Rutger A. van Santen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilSimon Fraser University
FundersLuonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryElementary reactionDensity functional theoryMoleculeAb initioDiagramReaction mechanismPotential energy surfaceCluster (spacecraft)Chemical physicsReaction rateProtonOxygenComputational chemistryWater splittingAb initio quantum chemistry methodsPhysical chemistryCatalysisKineticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used density functional theory to investigate the reaction pathway of oxygen reduction/water splitting at a tetrahedral Pt(4) cluster. Four extra water molecules were included to account for the effect of water in mediating elementary surface processes. We propose a 6-step reaction sequence that includes a proton transfer between neighbouring active sites. Thermochemical considerations and the nudged elastic band method were employed to calculate reaction and activation energies for the elementary reaction steps. We generated the free energy diagram along the reaction path for various applied potentials. This plot provides vital information on the stability of intermediates and the rate determining processes in oxygen reduction and water splitting. Results suggest that removal of the reaction product, viz. molecular oxygen or water, is an energetically strongly hindered step in either direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207