MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103500238 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810370

Hydrodynamic Behavior of a Three‐Phase Spouted Bed with Very Large Particles

2003· article· en· W2103500238 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinfu Wang, Tiefeng Wang, Lizao Liu, He Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoulingNozzleBreakupMechanicsParticle (ecology)Materials sciencePressure dropBubbleParticle depositionLiquid phaseTwo-phase flowFluidizationCirculation (fluid dynamics)Drop (telecommunication)ChemistryThermodynamicsFluidized bedGeologyMembranePhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hydrodynamic behavior of a three‐phase spouted bed with large particles of diameter 10.5, 12 and 16mm was studied. Liquid circulation was used to spout the large particles. Experiments were carried out to study the influence of the superficial gas velocity, liquid circulation velocity, particle diameter and settled particle bed height on the minimum liquid spouting velocity, pressure drop and gas holdup. In the spouted regime, liquid circulation and the movement of the large particles enhance bubble breakup and increase the gas holdup. The frequent collision of these large particles with the reactor wall and nozzles are helpful in preventing fouling. This indicates a potential application in gas‐liquid systems in which fouling occurs due to deposition and adhesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207