MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103507164 · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcg043

Vitamin B12 insufficiency and the risk of fetal neural tube defects

2003· review· en· W2103507164 on OpenAlexaff
Joel G. Ray, Henk J. Blom

Bibliographic record

VenueQJM · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin B12MedicinePregnancyCase-control studyFetusNeural tubeNeural tube defectAmniotic fluidRisk factorMethylmalonic acidInternal medicineObstetricsGastroenterologyPhysiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although maternal folate insufficiency is a risk factor for fetal neural tube defects (NTDs), there is controversy about whether vitamin B12 (B12) insufficiency is also associated with an increased risk of NTDs. AIM: To investigate whether low maternal B12 is associated with an increased risk of fetal NTDs. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline between 1980 and October 2002, with an examination of the citations of all retrieved studies. Studies were included that: (i) used a cohort or case-control design; (ii) included case mothers with a prior or current NTD-affected pregnancy; (iii) assessed a group of unaffected 'controls'; and (iv) measured the vitamin B12 status of all participants. RESULTS: Overall, 17 case-control studies were included, mean sample size 33 cases and 93 controls. In 5/6, mean amniotic fluid B12 concentration was significantly lower in case mothers than in controls. Of 11 that measured maternal serum or plasma B12, three observed a significantly lower mean concentration in case mothers vs. controls, while five others found a non-significant lower trend in the case group. One study observed a significantly higher mean concentration of maternal serum methylmalonic acid among the maternal cases, while another found a non-significant lower mean concentration of plasma holo-transcobalamin. Five studies estimated the risk of NTDs in relation to low B12 or B12-related metabolic markers: it was significantly increased in three studies, with a non-significant trend in the fourth. DISCUSSION: There seems to be a moderate association between low maternal B12 status and the risk of fetal NTDs. However, several design limitations, and the inclusion of few study participants, may have under-represented this. A large observational study, using reliable and valid indicators of B12 status in early pregnancy, could best assess the association between B12 insufficiency and the risk of fetal NTDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQJMSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207