MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103524072 · doi:10.7202/007643ar

The rise of an Alaskan Native bourgeoisie

2004· article· en· W2103524072 on OpenAlex
Arthur Mason

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes/Inuit/Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCapitalismSettlement (finance)BourgeoisiePolitical economySocial stratificationSociologyPrivilege (computing)Petite bourgeoisiePolitical sciencePoliticsLawEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article tells the story of a group of Alaska indigenous leaders’ transition to capitalism. With Congressional passage of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) in 1971, a new economic position emerges in Alaska Native society which creates opportunities for indigenous leaders to develop an awareness of themselves as a particular type of entrepreneurial group. Based on observation and analysis, this story traces the development of Kodiak Island Native leaders and relates their enduring apprehension as emerging capitalist agents who become conscious of their role as bearers of a project of identity formation. I claim that pre-ANCSA Kodiak society is a particular system of stratification in which social and cultural sources of power and privilege are dominant. The transition to post-ANCSA society is a process of converting devalued forms of power into new, economically defined forms and marks a shift from rank order to capitalist class stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it