A Kinematic Control Framework for Single-Slave Asymmetric Teleoperation Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with asymmetrical teleoperation, where the master/slave subsystems have different degrees of mobility. In particular, dual-master trilateral control of a possibly kinematically redundant slave robot (KRSR) and single-master control of a kinematically deficient slave robot (KDSR) are considered. In the case of a KDSR, the motion of the master robot is restricted to the natural motion constraint of the slave robot. Trilateral teleoperation is achieved via two master devices, each controlling a dedicated frame that is assigned on the slave robot. A novel control framework is presented that accomplishes two objectives: 1) motion and force tracking of the master and slave robots within their nonconstrained task spaces and 2) constrained master robot(s) motion that reflects the slave natural constraint (KDSR) or the kinematic constraint on each of the slave taskspace control frames (trilateral teleoperation). The proposed adaptive controller utilizes projection and generalized pseudoinverse matrices to achieve the stated teleoperation objectives. Stability and transparency of the asymmetric teleoperation system are demonstrated analytically and experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it