CC Chemokine Receptor-2 Is Not Essential for the Development of Antigen-Induced Pulmonary Eosinophilia and Airway Hyperresponsiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monocyte chemoattractant proteins-1 and -5 have been implicated as important mediators of allergic pulmonary inflammation in murine models of asthma. The only identified receptor for these two chemokines to date is the CCR2. To study the role of CCR2 in a murine model of Ag-induced asthma, we compared the pathologic and physiological responses of CCR2(-/-) mice with those of wild-type (WT) littermates following immunization and challenge with OVA. OVA-immunized/OVA-challenged (OVA/OVA) WT and CCR2(-/-) mice developed significant increases in total cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) compared with their respective OVA-immunized/PBS-challenged (OVA/PBS) control groups. There were no significant differences in BAL cell counts and differentials (i.e., macrophages, PMNs, lymphocytes, and eosinophils) between OVA/OVA WT and CCR2(-/-) mice. Serologic evaluation revealed no significant difference in total IgE and OVA-specific IgE between OVA/OVA WT mice and CCR2(-/-) mice. Lung mRNA expression and BAL cytokine protein levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-gamma were also similar in WT and CCR2(-/-) mice. Finally, OVA/OVA CCR2(-/-) mice developed increased airway hyper-responsiveness to a degree similar to that in WT mice. We conclude that following repeated airway challenges with Ag in sensitized mice, the development of Th2 responses (elevated IgE, pulmonary eosinophilia, and lung cytokine levels of IL-4 and IL5) and the development of airway hyper-responsiveness are not diminished by a deficiency in CCR2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".