Effects of inhaled ciclesonide on circulating T‐helper type 1/T‐helper type 2 cells in atopic asthmatics after allergen challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The predominance of T-helper type 2 (Th2) lymphocytes is thought to underlie the pathogenesis of asthma. Allergen inhalation challenge in atopic asthmatic subjects is associated with decreased interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) positive CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in peripheral blood and induced sputum. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of an inhaled corticosteroid on these previously described allergen-induced changes in circulating Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to 7 days of placebo, 40 or 80 micro g ciclesonide in a crossover study. Airway responses and peripheral blood were measured before and after treatment, and 24 h after allergen challenge. RESULTS: Ciclesonide 40 and 80 micro g significantly attenuated the late response and sputum eosinophils at 8 h post-allergen (P<0.05). Circulating IFN-gamma positive CD4+ lymphocytes decreased after allergen challenge with placebo (P<0.05), and this was inhibited by 40 micro g ciclesonide treatment (P<0.05). There was no effect of allergen inhalation or ciclesonide on IL-4-positive CD4+ lymphocytes or IFN-gamma and IL-4-positive CD8(high) lymphocytes. The allergen-induced change of IFN-gamma/IL-4 ratio on CD4+ cells correlated with the allergen-induced change of peripheral blood eosinophils. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that attenuation of allergen-induced airway responses by ciclesonide may be mediated through regulation of IFN-gamma-positive CD4+ cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".