A Review of Molecular Contrasts Between Arresting and Viable Porcine Attachment Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significant spontaneous fetal loss of unknown cause occurs in North American commercial swine. About 30% of conceptuses, thought to be genetically normal, are lost during the peri-attachment period. An additional 20% are lost at mid-pregnancy. Littermate endometrial and trophoblast biopsies were studied by quantitative real-time PCR for gene expression, and immunohistochemistry for protein expression at gestation day (gd)15-23 and 50. RNA analyses were also conducted on endometrial lymphocytes and arterial endothelial cells removed from biopsies by laser capture microdissection. Genes were selected for study from human literature and cloned as required. As in humans, angiogenic, cytokine, chemokine and chemokine decoy receptor gene expression occurs at the porcine maternal-fetal interface. In each tissue studied, distinct patterns of expression are found between early and mid-pregnancy, as well as between viable and arresting conceptus attachment sites. These changes involve both endometrial lymphocytes and dendritic cells. Restriction in endometrial angiogenesis, reduction in expression of the chemokine decoy receptor D6, and reduction in dendritic cell numbers contribute to fetal arrest. In peri-attachment loss, interferon-gamma is more abundantly transcribed than tumor necrosis factor-alpha, but this ratio is reversed during midgestation failure. Further characterization of spontaneous fetal loss in pigs will identify targets for modification by hog producers and may provide a model for identification of antecedents to fetal loss in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".