Late Effects in the Era of Modern Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extended-field and subtotal nodal radiation therapy (RT), developed in the 1960s, was the first reliably curative treatment for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, the large volume of normal tissue irradiated resulted in significant delayed toxicity, including cardiac disease and second cancers (SCs). The 30-year cumulative incidence of heart disease among adult survivors receiving 40-45 Gy of extended-field or mantle RT is approximately 30%; the incidence of SCs is similar. Improving disease control while reducing the toxicity of treatment has been a major objective of HL trials for more than 2 decades. Contemporary involved-field RT (IFRT) reduces irradiated volumes and produces significant reductions in normal tissue dose compared with historic treatments. Recent data indicate that, compared with mantle RT, IFRT reduces the relative risk of breast cancer among young females receiving mediastinal RT by approximately 60% and also reduces cardiac dose. The recent transition to involved-node RT allows further reductions in normal tissue dose. Response-adapted therapy is being evaluated in clinical trials as a means of identifying those patients most likely to benefit from treatment reduction or intensification, enhanced screening will facilitate early intervention to reduce the clinical burden of late effects, and there is increasing interest in elucidating the genetic correlates of treatment toxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it