MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103638442 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2005.1461677

Practical capacity calculation for time-hopping ultra-wide band multiple-access communications

2005· article· en· W2103638442 on OpenAlex
Abdulkareem Adinoyi, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime-hoppingComputer scienceCutoffSynchronization (alternating current)Frequency-hopping spread spectrumCommunications systemChannel capacitySpread spectrumComputer networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter the practical capacity, known as the cutoff rate, of time-hopping (TH) ultra-wide band (UWB) communication system is evaluated for multiple-access channels. The cutoff rate can be used for determining various system tradeoffs. For instance, it is shown in this letter that if synchronization problems would preclude high spreading factors, a suitable number of hops can be used instead to achieve the same performance. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the cutoff rate evaluated here can be a fast way of gaining insights into the multiuser capacity of TH-PPM UWB systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it