On the Pseudomorphing of Melt-filled Pores During the Crystallization of Migmatites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudomorphs of melt-filled pores, recognized by their generally cuspate shape, are used as diagnostic for the former presence of partial melt. They are commonly observed in migmatites from the mid- to deep crust although they occur in the smaller pores in migmatites from shallower levels (1–2 kbar). The pseudomorphing of melt-filled pores is controlled by the kinetics of nucleation and is a consequence of the greater supersaturation required for nucleation in a small pore compared with a larger one. We examine three migmatites in detail: a contact metamorphosed cherty band from an iron formation; an Archaean regional granulite from an accretionary prism; and an amphibolite-facies sample from the roots of an Archaean mountain chain. The greater undercooling required for nucleation in progressively smaller pores is recorded by the composition of plagioclase pseudomorphs. A study of dihedral angles at the corners of pseudomorphed pores demonstrates that melt–solid textural equilibrium was probably attained only in the contact aureole. The regional granulite preserves an almost unmodified reaction-controlled melt distribution, with little evidence for either melt–solid textural equilibration or solid–solid re-equilibration, whereas the reaction-controlled melt distribution in the regional amphibolite-facies example has been modified by a partial approach to solid–solid textural equilibrium. It is not clear whether the differences in dihedral angle population are due to differences in uplift and exhumation rates or due to the presence of H2O on grain boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it