Instantaneous Erasures in Oversampled Filter Banks: Conditions for Output Perfect Reconstruction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we aim at finding the conditions that an oversampled filter bank (OFB) should satisfy, in order to maintain its perfect reconstruction property when erasures happen in the subband domain. This problem has been addressed before mainly from frame-theoretic point of view and only for the case of what we call in this paper classic erasure. In the frame-theoretic approach, the stable filter banks are associated with frames in ℓ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> (\BBZ) and a subband erasure is defined as the deletion of the frame expansion coefficients corresponding to the frame vectors resulting from each filter and all its translated versions. This is equivalent to assuming that all the samples of a subband have been completely lost (classic erasure) and this is why in this approach it is always assumed that each channel is either working perfectly or not at all. In this paper, we extend this notion of erasure to a situation where subband channels are allowed to be on or off arbitrarily in each time instance and we define a new type of erasure called instantaneous erasure. Using an approach based on the time-domain analysis of perfect reconstruction property, we introduce general conditions for perfect reconstruction of the output and also the sufficient conditions for two classes of filter banks: Causal OFBs with causal inverse and OFBs with maximum robustness against classic erasure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it