MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103682271 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2011.2170159

High-Speed Q-Modulation of Injection-Locked Semiconductor Lasers

2011· article· en· W2103682271 on OpenAlexaff
X. Wang, Lukas Chrostowski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirpFrequency modulationSemiconductor laser theoryModulation (music)LaserInjection lockingBandwidth (computing)Resonance (particle physics)OptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsAmplitude modulationMaterials scienceAtomic physicsTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel approach for high-speed direct modulation of optically injection-locked semiconductor lasers by modulating the photon lifetime (or the Q-factor). Based on the injection locking rate equations, the frequency response is analytically derived and numerically simulated. Compared with conventional current modulation for injection-locked lasers, Q-modulation has the same resonance frequency, but the dc-to-resonance roll-off caused by the real-pole frequency is largely eliminated, and the response beyond the resonance frequency decays much slower; therefore, a significant enhancement in the modulation bandwidth can be achieved. We also show that the two modulation methods have similar chirp characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207