MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103728008 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2004.833197

Sequence Detection and Adaptive Channel Estimation for ISI Channels Under Class-A Impulsive Noise

2004· article· en· W2103728008 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Schober, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceAlgorithmGaussian noiseComputer scienceNoise (video)Channel (broadcasting)Estimation theoryEntropy (arrow of time)Upper and lower boundsMaximum likelihood sequence estimationFadingMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, sequence detection and channel estimation for frequency-selective, intersymbol interference (ISI)-producing channels under Class-A impulsive noise are considered. We introduce a novel suboptimum sequence detection (SSD) scheme and show that although SSD employs a simplified metric, it achieves practically the same performance as maximum-likelihood sequence detection (MLSD). For both SSD and MLSD, a lower bound on the achievable performance is derived, which is similar to the classical matched-filter bound for frequency-selective (fading) channels under Gaussian noise. For channel estimation, we adopt a minimum entropy criterion and derive efficient least-mean-entropy and recursive least-entropy algorithms. For both adaptive algorithms, we analyze the steady-state channel-estimation error variance. Theoretical considerations and simulation results show that in Class-A impulsive noise, the proposed sequence detection and adaptive channel-estimation schemes yield significant performance gains over their respective conventional counterparts (designed for Gaussian noise). Although the novel algorithms require knowledge of the Class-A noise-model parameters, their computational complexity is comparable to that of the corresponding conventional algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207