MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103734234 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2016756

Personalized X-Ray 3-D Reconstruction of the Scoliotic Spine From Hybrid Statistical and Image-Based Models

2009· article· en· W2103734234 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Kadoury, Farida Chériet, Hubert Labelle

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertebraArtificial intelligenceSagittal planeComputer visionComputer scienceProjection (relational algebra)Iterative reconstructionCoronal planeSegmentationRadiographyPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMedicineAnatomyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel 3-D reconstruction method of the scoliotic spine using prior vertebra models with image-based information taken from biplanar X-ray images. We first propose a global modeling approach by exploiting the 3-D scoliotic curve reconstructed from a coronal and sagittal X-ray image in order to generate an approximate statistical model from a 3-D database of scoliotic patients based on a transformation algorithm which incorporates intuitive geometrical properties. The personalized 3-D reconstruction of the spine is then achieved with a novel segmentation method which takes into account the variable appearance of scoliotic vertebrae (rotation, wedging) from standard quality images in order to segment and isolate individual vertebrae on the radiographic planes. More specifically, it uses prior 3-D models regulated from 2-D image level set functionals to identify and match corresponding bone structures on the biplanar X-rays. An iterative optimization procedure integrating similarity measures such as deformable vertebral contours regulated from high-level anatomical primitives, morphological knowledge and epipolar constraints is then applied to globally refine the 3-D anatomical landmarks on each vertebra level of the spine. This method was validated on twenty scoliotic patients by comparing results to a standard manual approach. The qualitative evaluation of the retro-projection of the vertebral contours confirms that the proposed method can achieve better consistency to the X-ray image's natural content. A comparison to synthetic models and real patient data also yields good accuracy on the localization of low-level primitives such as anatomical landmarks identified by an expert on each vertebra. The experiments reported in this paper demonstrate that the proposed method offers a better matching accuracy on a set of landmarks from biplanar views when compared to a manual technique for each evaluated cases, and its precision is comparable to 3-D models generated from magnetic resonance images, thus suitable for routine 3-D clinical assessment of spinal deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207